Kasia RussekDesign Office ManagerMain Contractor
Kane Group logo

Kane Group

Kasia Russek asked her document controllers how much time Morta saved them. The answer was two days a week each , 256 hours a month from just four people. She built the entire system single-handedly across 11 projects and 60 users.

Executive summary

Kane Group, an MEP building services contractor with approximately 250 staff, transitioned from manual Excel-based design tracking to Morta. Design Office Manager Kasia Russek built and manages the entire system single-handedly, covering internal release schedules (IRS), TIDPs, technical submittals (PTS), RFI tracking, model tracking, and design information monitoring. With API integrations to Viewpoint and client CDEs (Conject, Asite), the system runs across 11 projects with 60 users, automatically syncing data daily and feeding Power BI dashboards for project summaries and client progress reports. Document controllers report saving two days per week each , totalling 256 hours per month from just four people.

Why MortaAPI integration with Viewpoint and client CDEs was the game changer , it connected Kane’s internal tracking to client systems automatically, something Excel could never do.
Team size1 person , Kasia Russek built and manages the entire system single-handedly across 11 projects and 60 users
SectorMEP
11Projects on Morta
256 hrsSaved per month
AutomatedRevision comparison
Real-timeMismatch detection
60 usersManaged by 1 person

I asked our document control guys how much time Morta saved them, and what they said was two days a week. That means 256 hours a month saved, and it’s just from four document controllers.

Kasia Russek, Design Office Manager @ Kane Group

The results

Four document controllers each reported saving two days per week , totalling 256 hours per month of manual effort eliminated. Time previously spent on manual data entry, colouring cells, copying between tabs, and chasing missing information is now fully automated. The system scaled from an initial pilot to 11 active projects with 60 users engaging daily, from design team members and document controllers to procurement, pre-construction, and site teams.

All data from Viewpoint and external CDEs like Conject and Asite is synced automatically every night. Internal revision numbers are compared against external CDE revisions in real time, so when Kane issues a drawing, the team can immediately verify it appeared on the client’s system with the correct revision. Status codes sync automatically from external CDEs. Drawings move between views , withdrawn, site only, internal issue only , based on document type changes, eliminating the manual copy-paste between Excel tabs that used to consume hours.

Project summary reports and client progress reports are generated instantly from Morta data, replacing manually created Excel reports. Kane is planning to migrate these dashboards to Morta’s native charting to eliminate the Power BI license dependency. And the entire implementation across all 11 projects and 60 users is built and maintained by Kasia Russek alone.

What is good about Morta is that we can give the login to the client and they can log in themselves and see fresh information every day.

Kasia Russek, Design Office Manager @ Kane Group

The challenge

As Kane Group grew, the volume of design drawings, technical submittals, and project data increased dramatically. More projects meant more manual work and more mistakes. All data updates were performed by hand , manual colouring of cells, manual date entry, manual status tracking, and manual copying between tabs. Every revision, every status change, and every new drawing required someone to physically update a spreadsheet.

Project information was fragmented across numerous Excel spreadsheets and folder structures with no single source of truth for design status. Kane’s internal tracking was completely disconnected from client common data environments , there was no way to automatically verify whether issued drawings had actually appeared on the client’s system, or to track external status code assignments without manual checking.

Manual data entry led to duplicated drawing numbers and descriptions creeping into trackers. These duplications cascaded into wrong calculations, which produced wrong reports. There is nothing worse than going through each revision, status, or date and looking for that missing slash somewhere. What worked for a handful of projects became unmanageable as the project count grew, and the design office needed a system that could handle multiple concurrent projects without proportionally increasing administrative overhead.

All the movements between tables are automated. If any drawing is not required anymore, we type in the document type as withdrawn and it automatically goes to the withdrawn tab. No one needs to copy and paste into another tab as we did in Excel.

Kasia Russek, Design Office Manager @ Kane Group

The solution

Kasia designed the entire system around the Internal Release Schedule as the master table from which everything flows. It contains the complete list of drawings with descriptions, planned issue dates, actual issue dates, responsible persons, document types, and fortnightly meeting comments. From the first issue date onward, everything is automated , no manual input needed.

The IRS is sliced into filtered views for every stakeholder: a TIDP view for client-facing deliverable tracking, workload by person showing each team member’s drawing assignments and status, overdue items for immediate action, preliminary status views for items requiring response, construction status views for revision requirements, a programme drop line view for pre-construction teams, and automated tabs for withdrawn, site only, and internal issue only items. All the movements between tables are automated , if any drawing is not required anymore, changing the document type to withdrawn moves it to the withdrawn tab automatically.

Morta connects to Kane’s internal CDE (Viewpoint) and multiple client CDEs including Conject, Asite, and others, syncing revision numbers, status codes, upload dates, and document metadata daily. Technical submittal tracking is split by mechanical and electrical disciplines, with procurement teams having dedicated columns for order information. An RFI tracker shows open, closed, and resolved requests across all projects. A model tracker monitors third-party model updates and flags when Kane’s design team needs to update their work. And a design information tracker ensures document control knows immediately when external parties update their submissions. All of this feeds into Power BI for project summary reports and client progress reports shared weekly.

I asked our document control guys how much time Morta saved them, and what they said was two days a week. That means 256 hours a month saved, and it’s just from four document controllers.

Kasia Russek, Design Office Manager @ Kane Group

The implementation

The original plan was simply to create an Internal Release Schedule to replace the Excel tracker. Once the IRS was built and the automated CDE integration was working, the potential for expansion became immediately clear. Kasia progressively added views for different needs , TIDP views, workload by person, overdue items, status-specific views, revision tracking, and programme drop line views. Each addressed a specific user need without requiring additional data entry.

Once the IRS is set up with CDE integrations, data flows are almost entirely automated. First issue dates, revision comparisons, status syncs, overdue calculations, and time-with-client tracking all happen without manual input. This is the key reason one person can manage 11 projects. Each project may connect to different client CDEs , Conject, Asite, Viewpoint, and others , but the structure remains consistent. The system accommodates variation in client environments while maintaining a standardised internal tracking approach.

Clients can log into Morta directly and see fresh information every day, or data can be exported to Excel for distribution. Kane is actively planning to move reporting from Power BI to Morta’s native dashboards, which would eliminate the need for separate Power BI licenses and keep all data and visualisation within a single platform.

Before & after

Before

Manual data entry, colouring cells, copying between tabs

After

256 hours per month saved from just 4 document controllers

Before

No way to verify drawings appeared on client’s system

After

Internal vs external revisions compared automatically in real time

Before

Duplicated drawing numbers producing wrong reports

After

Automated duplication prevention and real-time accuracy

About Kane Group

Kane Group is an MEP building services contractor employing approximately 250 staff across the UK and Ireland.

What's next

Migrating dashboards from Power BI to Morta’s native charting to eliminate the Power BI license dependency. Also planning to track as-built drawings, O&M drawings, and BCA compliance.

Want to see how this could work for your projects?

Frequently asked questions.

Common questions about this template and how it works.

How does Kane Group track internal vs external revisions?

Morta automatically compares internal revision numbers with those on the external CDE (Viewpoint, Conject, Asite). This ensures that when Kane issues a drawing, it actually appears on the client’s system with the correct revision. Status codes are also synced automatically from the external CDE.

Can one person really manage the entire system?

Yes. Kasia Russek built and manages the entire Morta implementation at Kane Group single-handedly, covering 11 projects and 60 users. The key is automation , once the IRS main table is set up with CDE integrations, everything from first issue dates to revision comparisons to status tracking is automated.

How does the workload tracking work?

Each drawing in the IRS is assigned to a responsible person. Morta’s filtered views then show workload by person , displaying which drawings they’re responsible for, which need issuing, which are approved, and what comments exist. Separate views show overdue items, preliminary statuses requiring action, and construction-stage items needing revision.

Get started

Try Morta on a real project.